‘The Erl-King’ is one of the more innovative and
experimental of the Carter narratives in The Bloody Chamber as it has a blend
of the detailed and the simple, a heavy use of abstract imagery and has a
constant change in narrative perspective; all of which are present in the
statement provided. Despite Carter’s use of the experimental and innovative in
other Bloody Chamber stories, I agree that, with the quotation, it shows The
Erl-King to be the most innovative and experimental of the narratives.
The statement contains intricate descriptions of the
environment that the narrator is in, a lot like the narrative itself, which
features an open paragraph that has the qualities of a prose poem, while
contrasting it with the simple. Many of her other works, including The Bloody
Chamber, do also contain incredible vivid descriptions of the narrators
surroundings, but The Erl-King manages to balance the complex and the easy. “The
woods enclose and then enclose again” provides us with an idea of just how the
environment seems to the narrator, disorientating and bizarre; this alongside
the simile “like a system of Chinese boxes opening one into another” gives us
an elaborate plan of just how perplexing the situation is through this use of
description. And this can be contrasted with the final statement of “it is easy
to lose yourself in these woods” – the sentence simply rounds up the entire
statement without resorting to the deeply philosophical and abstract
descriptions that she has provided beforehand; this may be to provide comic
relief or to finish the statement in a calm and complete way, because the
sentence is quite an understatement, given the drastic lengths the narrator has
gone to describe the situation she is in. This drastic experimental use of
descriptive contrasts panders to the text’s Gothic genre with the use of
duality.
Abstract imagery is used gratuitously throughout the novel,
and even features in the small statement. Similar abstract imagery features
also in Carter’s other works like The Bloody Chamber, and even more so in The
Snow Child with its use of raven feathers and pools of blood in snow, but it isn’t
quite as melancholic as The Erl-King is. For example, the environment is
described as being like “Chinese boxes”; this forces us to interpret the image
of a Chinese box and also makes us associate the forest with oriental imagery, which
is usually associated with mystery and mythology and fits in with the text’s
Gothic genre of fantasy and mystery. Also, the forest is described as having “perpetually
receded before” her which is difficult to imagine and shows us just how
confused the character is; this plays into the psychological part of the book’s
Gothic genre.
The shifting narrative perspective in The Erl-King is very
experimental and often causes confusion with the reader. This kind of
experimentation is a prominent feature in post-modern literature and doesn’t
feature as prominently in Carter’s other works (The Courtship of Mr Lyon
changes which character it focuses on in a very fluid manner, but doesn’t go so
far as to change the narrative perspective in such a way as The Erl-King). The
narrator begins to generalise herself as “the interloper”, but continues with
this and then refers to an “imaginary traveller” – this shift in narrative
perspective shows the confusion and isolation that the narrator is suffering,
so much so that she begins to not only see herself from an external, omniscient
view, but from such a perspective that she cannot realise herself. In the same
sentence, she shifts back to first-person by stating “me”, which possibly shows
her gradual realisation that something is wrong with the environment she is in.
From this, I conclude that the statement indeed does support
the idea that The Erl-King is more innovative and more experimental than the
other short stories in Carter’s The Bloody Chamber as it encapsulates all the
literary devices and aspects of narrative that makes The Erl-King an exceedingly
unusual text.
Dan.
ReplyDeleteWhilst your points are sound you will need textual support from the other TBC in order to validate your argument.
You also need to establish what sort of narratives the collected works are, focus on their form (i.e. fairy tales) as well as the gothic. There are two different conventions for both these so in order to claim the tale is innovative you need to acknowledge how innovative the collection is compared to 'traditional' works and then how 'innovative' the Erl King is in relation to those. Keep it routed in gothic and expand points (where applicable) to critical interpretations.